Opinion
Trump threatens military action against Nigeria: Musings on his real intentions
By Yusuf Bangura Nyon,
The article, ‘’Hypocrisy as Policy’’, by Global Geopolitics (attached) is a good reaction to Trump’s insane, but self-serving, threat to invade Nigeria under the pretext of stopping a so-called Christian genocide in that country. However, his insanity may not be without material foundations.
As the Global Geopolitics article notes, Nigeria is located within a resource-rich region that is highly important to the supply chains of US hi tech companies and defence industries. That region stretches from Nigeria through Niger and Chad to Sudan and is endowed with vast amounts of uranium, lithium, cobalt, and rare earths.
Apart from oil, Nigeria has vast reserves of lithium, cobalt, nickel and rare earth elements, which are embedded in solid rock and heavy mineral sands. It is ranked fifth globally in rare earth deposits—behind China, the U.S., Myanmar and Australia.
The US has been strategising about how to end its high level of dependence on China for rare earths, which are used in clean energy, such as electric vehicles, solar panels and wind turbines; as well as in electronic consumer products, such as LED screens, computers and smart phones. These minerals are also required to produce jet engines, missile guidance and defence systems, satellites, and GPS equipment.
After threatening China with a 140% tariff when China imposed restrictions on the global supply of rare earths, Trump quickly made a U-turn in his recent meeting with China’s president, Xi. He realised that a trade war with China on rare earths would profoundly hurt the US economy. Under the deal he struck with Xi, Trump agreed to end the tariff threat and lift the ban on Chinese companies’ access to US chips, while Xi agreed to restart China’s supply of rare earths and purchase U.S. soyabeans for one year. Trump praised Xi as a great leader when he returned to the US.
It is clear that the US is in panic mode in the geopolitics of rare earths trade. In his recent visit to Southeast Asia, Trump signed a raft of agreements with several countries in the region to beef up the production and processing of rare earths and exports to the U.S.
Various reports by experts in geopolitics in the US indicate that the Trump administration sees Africa as an important source of critical minerals that will help wean the U.S. from China. The administration brokered a peace deal between the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda in June 2025, which included an investment agreement that allows the U.S. to invest in DRC’s minerals. Deals with other countries, such as Kenya, Tanzania, Angola, Malawi, and Namibia are being discussed or supported.
US interests are not driven by humanitarian concerns
The history of the US’s quest for foreign resources indicates that the US uses multiple strategies to achieve its goals: coercion, war, bribery and diplomacy. Coercion involves suspending aid or other economic opportunities (such as low tariffs) and political support to compel an adversary to bend to the will of the U.S.
When Trump suspended the US’s aid programme and declared a global trade war in April 2025, several African and other leaders rushed to make deals with him. Global Witness revealed in July 2025 that 17 countries (including six from Africa—viz Angola, DRC, Liberia, Mozambique, Rwanda and Somalia) have hired Trump loyalists as lobbyists, to help broker deals, ‘’with many bartering key resources including minerals in exchange for humanitarian or military support’’.
The use of war to pursue US strategic and economic interests is well documented. During the Cold War, the US and other Western countries simply intervened in countries that threatened their vital interests without bothering to disguise their actions with lofty humanitarian objectives.
One of the most famous cases was the US invasion of Guatemala in 1954 to stop the land reform programme by a leftist government that threatened the land holdings of the United Fruit Company—a US multinational with considerable power and interests in Central America. The brazen Anglo-French invasion of Egypt in 1956 when Egypt nationalised the Suez Canal is another well known case.
Often, when US interests were threatened, rather than go to war, US leaders relied on the CIA to work with local elements in the military to engineer a change of government or kill the incumbent president. The cases are overwhelming—such as the murder of Congo’s Patrice Lumumba in 1961, and the overthrow of Mohammed Mossadegh of Iran in 1953 and Salvador Allende of Chile in 1973. All these countries had huge mineral resources.
The rationale used by the US and its Western allies for invading countries changed when the Cold War ended in the 1990s and the US emerged as the sole superpower. The concept of humanitarian intervention gained ground within the UN system. This involved the US and other Western powers working through the UN to end wars and rebuild war-battered societies.
During that period, the US felt it didn’t face any more existential threat like communism and could act as a moral policeman of the world while hiding its real interests. That posture rhymed with the political values of the unipolar world: the spread of democracy, human rights, and markets.
The US, however, faced stiff resistance from most countries when it tried to use humanitarianism to overthrow governments that it didn’t like without evidence to support its claims. Matters came to a head in 2003 over Iraq, which the US invaded under the humanitarian pretext of disarming it of nuclear weapons. It turned out that there were no such weapons. The US was simply after Iraq’s oil and helping to dismember a formidable foe of Israel.
As the Global Geopolitical article demonstrates, US interventions under the pretext of humanitarianism have always been catastrophic for the people of those counties. After the old regime has been dislodged, the US often leaves the countries affected to sort out the mess while it retains control of the resources that are the hidden but real reason for the interventions.
Nigeria’s violence has multiple dimensions
Numerous reports and studies have shown that Nigeria’s violence affects both Christians and Muslims. No group is insulated from it. I can think of basically six types of violence in that country. The first three are the Boko Haram, Islamist-inspired violence in the Northeast, whose main victims are Muslims who reject their Islamist ideology; banditry in the Northwest, which affects Muslims and Christians in equal measure; and the herder-farmer conflict in the Middle Belt, which affects Christians and Muslims, although reports indicate that Christians are the main victims of that violence.
The other three types of violence are the herder-farmer violence in the Northwest in which Fulani herders are reportedly pitched against Hausa farmers (both groups are Muslim); the violence inflicted by the Indigenous People of Biafra and bandits in the East against their own people, Igbos, who are Christian; and general banditry in large parts of the country that has rendered travelling by road between cities a risky venture.
As can be seen from this review, while it can be argued that the Nigerian state’s policy of poor economic management, corruption and social exclusion have driven ordinary people to the edge, the state itself is not the key actor that is generating the violence. Non-state actors actively drive it.
I’ve tried to imagine what the US would do if it were to carry out its military threat. Would it bomb the Tinubu government out of existence, which would lead it to confront the real terror groups? Or would it ignore the Tinubu government and carry out a bombing campaign against the terrorists? Either way, the US will be involved in a messy and costly guerrilla war that it will have no stomach to fight.
It is important to note that the US has never been successful in defeating terror groups in their own countries. It lacks the energy, zeal, and commitment to sustain a long drawn out war. US history of intervention to save humanity is littered with abject failure: Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, and Somalia hold sobering lessons. However, the chaos of intervention may not prevent the US from trying to control Nigeria’s rich resources. Mining companies have a reputation of thriving in conflict zones by striking deals with local militias.
Conclusion
Tinubu has released a press statement in which he highlighted his government’s policy of engagement, since 2023, with Christian and Muslim leaders to address security challenges that affect ‘’citizens across faiths and regions’’. He affirmed that Nigeria is not a religiously intolerant country and opposes ‘’religious persecution’’.
However, his conclusion in the press release that his ‘’administration is committed to working with the United States government and the international community to deepen understanding and cooperation on protection of communities of all faiths’’ has raised eyebrows.
Could this be what Trump really wants to achieve with his military threat?: Get the Tinubu administration to open talks with the U.S., which will then try to introduce the issue of rare earths and other minerals in the negotiations.
Switzerland
2 November, 2025
Bangura.ym@gmail.com
Opinion
Gov Otu: Rewriting Cross River’s Healthcare Story With Historic 100% Pay Rise for Doctors
By Linus Obogo
In the quiet town of Ogoja, where the red earth stretches endlessly beneath the tropical sun and communities rise each morning to the rhythms of resilience and hope, a weary doctor named Dr. Monjok once wrestled with a difficult question: should he remain in public service or seek greener pastures elsewhere?
For years, his calling had kept him at the bedside of children battling malaria, expectant mothers navigating the uncertainties of childbirth, and elderly patients confronting the frailties of age. Through long nights, limited resources and mounting pressures, he remained steadfast. Yet the burden of inadequate remuneration and persistent manpower shortages often weighed heavily on his spirit. Today, however, Dr. Monjok stands taller, buoyed by renewed optimism, as Governor Bassey Otu’s administration ushers in a new era with a landmark 100 per cent salary increase for doctors across Cross River State.
This historic intervention is far more than a financial adjustment. It is a powerful declaration that those who dedicate their lives to preserving the health and dignity of others deserve to be honoured, valued and rewarded. It is a recognition of countless sacrifices made in consulting rooms, emergency wards and rural health centres where doctors often labour quietly, driven not by wealth but by duty. In one bold stroke, Governor Otu has infused fresh hope into a profession that forms the backbone of every thriving society.
For many healthcare professionals, the announcement represents a turning point, a breath of fresh air. It signals the emergence of a government that understands that healthcare is not merely a social service but a sacred obligation. It is an affirmation that those entrusted with saving lives should not themselves be left to struggle under the weight of neglect. By doubling doctors’ salaries, Governor Otu has not only boosted morale but has also strengthened the state’s capacity to retain talent and attract skilled professionals who might otherwise seek opportunities beyond its borders.
Yet the salary increase is only one chapter in a broader and exhilarating story of transformation unfolding across the health sector. Since assuming office, Governor Otu has increased funding to healthcare by more than 100 per cent, reflecting a deliberate and strategic commitment to rebuilding a sector that lies at the heart of human development.
It is a demonstration of leadership that recognizes that healthy citizens are the foundation upon which prosperous economies and stable societies are built.
This commitment is equally evident in the lifting of the long-standing embargo on employment within the health sector and the approval of the recruitment of 2,000 additional healthcare workers. Across urban centres and rural communities alike, this decision is expected to bridge critical manpower gaps, improve access to medical services and bring relief to overstretched facilities.
For many communities that have long endured shortages of healthcare personnel, the development represents a long-awaited answer to years of yearning.
In the creekside settlements, riverine communities and bustling townships of Cross River, the echoes of this transformation are already reverberating. At General Hospital, Ukem, where years of wear had dulled the promise of quality care, a new chapter is unfolding. The release of funds for its renovation, alongside the rehabilitation of Cottage Hospital, Oban, and the revival of the once-abandoned General Hospital complex in Akpabuyo, reflects a government determined to restore healthcare institutions to their rightful place as sanctuaries of healing and hope.
These projects are more than bricks and mortar. They are monuments to purposeful governance and symbols of a future in which quality healthcare is not a privilege reserved for a few but a right accessible to all. Each renovated ward, restored facility and upgraded theatre represents another step towards a healthier and more resilient Cross River.
Dr. Monjok’s story is mirrored in the experiences of countless citizens whose lives intersect daily with the healthcare system. It is reflected in the expectant mother who no longer has to travel great distances in search of prenatal care. It is evident in the child whose access to treatment is no longer determined by geography. It is seen in families who can now look towards public health facilities with renewed confidence and expectation.
Governor Otu’s reforms have also embraced nurses, pharmacists, laboratory scientists, community health officers and other critical healthcare personnel through enhanced allowances and improved welfare packages.
The establishment of the Cross River State Hospital Management Board further underscores a commitment to accountability, efficiency and institutional excellence. Together, these measures will lay the foundation for a healthcare system that is modern, responsive and sustainable.
As Dr. Monjok now gazes across the rolling landscapes of Cross River, he sees more than familiar hills and valleys. He sees the dawning of a new possibility. What has begun as a bold policy decision will sooner than later, rapidly evolve into a healthcare renaissance capable of touching every corner of the state. In that unfolding story, every doctor is valued, every healthcare worker is empowered and every citizen is placed at the heart of governance.
Indeed, Governor Otu’s historic intervention is much more than increasing salaries; it is about restoring confidence, rekindling aspirations and rewriting the healthcare story of Cross River State with uncommon vision, courage and purpose.
Obogo is Chief Press Secretary and Special Adviser on Media and Publicity to Governor Bassey Otu
Opinion
General Olufemi Oluyede: The Man Steering Nigeria’s Defence into A New Era
By Sambo Sule
In the crucible of a nation forged by resilience, where shadows of uncertainty stretch long across savannah and coast, General Olufemi Olatubosun Oluyede emerges as a beacon of unyielding resolve. Like the ancient warriors of Ekiti soil—steadfast sentinels against tempests—he now stands at the helm of Nigeria’s Armed Forces as Chief of Defence Staff.
His appointment marks not merely a change of guard, but the dawn of a transformative epoch. It is one where discipline meets destiny, strategy dances with synergy, and the military reclaims its sacred covenant to shield the motherland.
Oluyede’s career has been defined by excellence and resilience. Rising through the ranks of the Nigerian Army, he has commanded troops in some of the most difficult operational theatres, earning respect for his tactical ingenuity and his ability to inspire confidence among soldiers and civilians alike.
Since assuming office, General Oluyede has prioritized jointness—the seamless integration of the Army, Navy, and Air Force into a unified fighting force. He believes that Nigeria’s security challenges require synergy, not fragmentation, and under his leadership, joint operations have become the hallmark of military campaigns.
This approach has already yielded results: in May 2026 alone, Nigerian troops neutralized over 317 terrorists, arrested 314 suspects, and rescued 221 kidnapped civilians, while recovering 93 assorted arms and dismantling illegal refining sites. These achievements reflect his insistence on coordination, precision, and professionalism.
Another defining feature of his leadership is the push for indigenous defence production. General Oluyede has championed the revitalization of the Defence Industries Corporation of Nigeria (DICON), ensuring that Nigeria reduces dependence on foreign suppliers and builds local capacity.
The CDS’ vision is to see Nigeria emerge as a regional hub for defence technology, capable of sustaining its own military requirements and contributing to African security. By encouraging local innovation, he is laying the foundation for a self-reliant Armed Forces that can adapt to evolving threats.
Civil-military relations are also central to his philosophy. General Oluyede has consistently emphasized that the Armed Forces exist to protect the people, not to intimidate them.
He has directed troops to uphold professionalism and respect for human rights in all operations, reinforcing trust between the military and civilians. His swift responses to crises—deploying reinforcements, ordering aerial surveillance, and ensuring humanitarian support—demonstrate his people-centric approach.
For him, threats against civilian peace are intolerable affronts to national sovereignty. Beyond operations, General Oluyede has invested in the intellectual and doctrinal development of the Armed Forces.
He has positioned the Joint Doctrine and Warfare Centre (JDWC) as the intellectual hub of Nigeria’s defence establishment, advancing doctrine, innovation, and technology to keep the Armed Forces adaptive to evolving threats. This institution ensures that Nigeria’s military remains aligned with global best practices while developing strategies tailored to local realities.
General Oluyede’s leadership style blends firmness with empathy. He commends troops for gallantry and tactical ingenuity, reinforcing morale across operational theatres.
At the same time, he insists on accountability, ensuring that discipline remains the bedrock of military service. His ability to balance operational demands with welfare considerations has strengthened the Armed Forces as an institution.
General Oluyede’s legacy is already taking shape. He is positioning Nigeria’s Armed Forces as a modern, self-reliant, and highly professional military. His emphasis on jointness, indigenous production, and civilian protection ensures that the Armed Forces remain not only a guarantor of sovereignty but also a trusted institution in the eyes of the people.
The CDS tenure is redefining Nigeria’s defence posture, positioning the country as a regional leader in security and stability. In the broader context of national development, his leadership underscores the critical role of the military in creating an environment of peace and stability.
By securing communities, protecting borders, and dismantling criminal networks, the Armed Forces under his command are enabling economic growth, social development, and national unity. His vision is not limited to the battlefield; it extends to the future of Nigeria as a secure, prosperous, and respected nation.
General Olufemi Oluyede is, indeed, the man steering Nigeria’s defence into a new era. His story is one of discipline, vision, and service—a reminder that leadership in uniform is not about power, but about responsibility, sacrifice, and the unwavering commitment to protect the nation and its people.
Sule is a public affairs analyst writing from Kaduna.
Opinion
The Man Behind the Rebuilding of Nigeria’s North-East
By Musa Sule
Alhaji Mohammed Goni Alkali, the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the North-East Development Commission (NEDC), has become a defining figure in Nigeria’s quest to restore dignity, rebuild infrastructure, and rekindle hope in a region long scarred by insurgency and underdevelopment. His leadership is not only about projects and policies; it is about people, about lives transformed, and about a vision that sees beyond the ruins of conflict to the promise of renewal.
From the very beginning of his career, Alkali distinguished himself as a man of intellect and discipline. Graduating with a First-Class degree in Accounting from Bayero University, Kano, and later earning a Master’s in Accounting and Finance from the London School of Economics, he laid a foundation of excellence that would guide his professional journey. His nearly three decades in banking, culminating in his role as Executive Director of Operations at the Bank of Industry (BOI), gave him the tools to manage complex financial systems and design interventions that empower communities. At BOI, he was instrumental in national schemes such as the ₦10 billion Rice Processing Fund and the ₦100 billion Cotton, Textile, and Garment Development Scheme, initiatives that revitalized industries and created jobs across Nigeria.
When Alkali was appointed to lead the NEDC in 2019, the North-East was at a crossroads. Years of insurgency had displaced millions, destroyed schools and hospitals, and left communities struggling to survive. His reappointment in 2023 was a testament to the confidence placed in his vision and his ability to deliver results. Under his stewardship, the Commission has become a beacon of hope, rolling out projects that directly touch lives. More than 3,500 housing units have been built across six states, providing shelter for families who had lost everything. Eighteen mega schools have been established, restoring education to children whose futures had been interrupted by conflict. Strategic roads such as Gombe-Abba-Kirfi and Alkaleri-Futuk have been developed, opening up trade corridors and reconnecting communities. Healthcare facilities have been equipped, and agricultural communities have been revived, ensuring that livelihoods are restored and dignity is returned.
Alkali’s leadership is marked by integrity and transparency. He has consistently emphasized that the NEDC is not a contract-dispensing agency but a humanitarian interventionist body. Every naira allocated to the Commission is judiciously used, reflecting his discipline and accountability. His grassroots approach—personally visiting communities, listening to their needs, and ensuring projects are executed faithfully—has earned him recognition as an Ambassador of Peace. Groups such as the North-East Elders and Youths Peoples Forum have praised his dedication to fostering unity and reconciliation, acknowledging that his leadership is not only rebuilding infrastructure but also healing wounds and restoring trust.
The impact of his work is visible everywhere. Children are returning to classrooms, families are moving into new homes, farmers are cultivating their land once more, and traders are reconnecting with markets through newly built roads. These are not abstract achievements; they are tangible transformations that speak to the power of visionary leadership. Alkali’s legacy will be remembered not just in the structures built but in the lives rebuilt, in the dignity restored, and in the hope rekindled across the region.
His story is ultimately one of transformation—of a man who has taken on the monumental task of rebuilding a region scarred by conflict and has done so with integrity, vision, and humanity. He is more than a technocrat; he is a bridge between government and grassroots realities, between policy and people, between despair and hope. His leadership at the NEDC is a testament to what is possible when competence meets compassion, and it offers a powerful reminder that even in the most challenging circumstances, visionary leadership can light the path toward a brighter future.
Alhaji Mohammed Goni Alkali’s leadership also underscores the importance of continuity and consistency in governance. By being reappointed in 2023, he has been able to sustain the momentum of NEDC’s projects, ensuring that initiatives are not abandoned midway but are carried through to completion. This continuity has allowed communities to trust the Commission’s work, knowing that promises made will be promises kept. His ability to balance immediate humanitarian needs with long-term development goals has created a framework that not only addresses the present but also secures the future.
In the broader context of Nigeria’s development, Alkali’s work at NEDC serves as a model for how interventionist agencies can function effectively. His insistence on transparency, his grassroots engagement, and his humanitarian focus are qualities that should inspire leaders across the country. He has shown that leadership is not about titles or positions, but about service, accountability, and impact. His legacy will endure not just in the North-East, but in the lessons his leadership offers to the entire nation.
Alkali’s leadership has also been about restoring confidence in governance. In a region where mistrust of institutions had grown due to years of neglect and conflict, his hands-on approach has reassured communities that government can indeed be a force for good. His presence in villages, his willingness to listen, and his determination to deliver have created a bond of trust between the Commission and the people it serves. This trust is invaluable, for it is the foundation upon which peace and progress are built.
Beyond infrastructure, Alkali has focused on human capital development. He understands that rebuilding the North-East is not just about bricks and mortar, but about investing in people. His emphasis on education, healthcare, and agriculture reflects a holistic vision of development. By equipping schools, training teachers, supporting farmers, and strengthening healthcare systems, he is laying the groundwork for a future where the North-East can thrive independently, resilient against future challenges.
His leadership has also had a symbolic impact. In a region often portrayed through the lens of conflict and despair, Alkali’s work has shifted the narrative to one of resilience and renewal. The stories emerging from the North-East today are not just about destruction, but about reconstruction; not just about displacement, but about resettlement; not just about despair, but about hope. This shift in narrative is powerful, for it changes how the region is perceived both within Nigeria and internationally, opening doors to investment, collaboration, and growth.
Alhaji Mohammed Goni Alkali is, indeed, the man behind the rebuilding of Nigeria’s North-East. His name will be remembered as one of the architects of hope, a leader who turned challenges into opportunities, despair into resilience, and destruction into reconstruction. His work is not just about today—it is about laying the foundation for generations to come, ensuring that the North-East is defined not by its past struggles but by its future promise.
Sule is a public affairs analyst based in Yola.
-
Cover10 months agoNRC to reposition train services nationwide.. Kayode Opeifa
-
Fashion9 years agoThese ’90s fashion trends are making a comeback in 2017
-
Entertainment9 years agoThe final 6 ‘Game of Thrones’ episodes might feel like a full season
-
Politics2 months agoNNPP Diaspora Stakeholder and Key Kwankwaso Ally, Dr. Usman Tijjani Shehu, Rejoins APC
-
Opinion2 years agoBureaucratic Soldier, Kana Ibrahim heads Ministry of Aviation and Aerospace After Transformative Tenure at Defence
-
Opinion1 year agoHon. Daniel Amos Shatters Records, Surpasses Predecessor’s Achievements in Just Two Years
-
Opinion7 months agoBarrister Somayina Chigbue, Esq: A rising legal leader shaping institutioal excellence in Nigeria
-
News11 months agoNigerian Nafisa defeats 69 Countries at UK Global Final English Competition
