Connect with us

Cover

Kogi, Niger, Nasarawa residents urge govs to sign death warrants

Published

on

Some residents of Kogi, Niger and Nasarawa States have called on their state governors to sign death warrants of prisoners on death row.

This is in the interest of justice and decongestion of Correctional Service Centres, they explained.

Making the appeal in separate interviews, the residents also called for outright abolishment or fine tuning of the law to address its attendant challenges and threats.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the residents responded to the agency’s survey on reasons for the governor’s negative attitude on the death warrants.

The respondents called for outright stripping of the governors of such power provided in the constitution.

Section 212(1), 33(1) and (161) of the 1999 Constitution granted governors the power to exercise mercy and pardon offenders, including signing of death warrants.

Mr Taiye Alabi, a Kogi based lawyer, said most governors do not want to be the cause of death of any person, and have deliberately refused to sign any death warrant before them.

“Looking at the challenges their (governors’) refusal to sign death warrants have constitute to justice system and the correction centres; they should be left out of it through constitutional amendment.

“In as much as there is no need for abolishing the laws on the death penalty, the signing by governors should be cancelled.

“Once an accused is tried and all evidences show and prove that the person is guilty and sentenced to death, he or she should immediately be killed without delay by any governor needing to sign to determine his or her fate,” Alabi said.

In his contribution, Mr Adegboyega Kolade, a legal practitioner, said he supported the death penalty law simply because people unfortunately play politics with everything in Nigeria.

Kolade flayed calls for abolition of the death penalty, moreso that the Holy Books say he who kills by the sword must surely die by the sword.

“This is related to the Mosaic law, which they call an eye for an eye. But a person who took another person’s life, which we all know is sacred, what should be the consequence of his action.

“Infact, it’s for the default of the governors that criminal minded people get encouraged to commit heinous crimes, knowing that they would get pardoned one day.

“As a legal practitioner with 35 years experience, I have several such personal experiences. It encourages more assassinations, wanton killings, ritual killings, banditry, Boko Haram, armed robbery, among others.

“This is what has led to the high level of insecurity that we see today in Nigeria,” Kolade asserted.

Mr Hamza Lawal, the Executive Director, Initiative for Grassroot Advancement in Nigeria (INGRA), said many governors since 2016 have refused to sign death warrants for inmates on the death row largely due to the slow process of appeals on those cases.

Lawal, a human rights activist, said: “We all know that an accused or convict has the right to appeal his or her conviction or judgement”.

He noted that such process took time because of huge backlog of cases due to the limited capacity of courts and judges in the country.

“I don’t think death penalty should be abolished because certain crimes deserve the death penalty, especially intentional murder and reasonable offences.

“One challenge that is already surfacing due to the refusal by governors to sign death warrants is the over congestion of our correctional institutions.

”From what I learnt, over 3,000 death row inmates are still in custody, and this is draining the resources of the correctional service and the nation,” he said.

Also, Mr Idris Miliki, the Executive Director, Conscience for Human Rights and Conflicts Resolutions (CHRCR), expressed displeasure with the death penalty in the country, saying it should be abolished.

Miliki declared that some people like him were against the death penalty in operation in the country, insisting that it must be abolished.

He noted that in spite of the killing of armed robbers from time in memorial, it has not stopped the robbery cases in Nigeria.

“The fundamental question is, can death of perpetrators compensate for the lives of victims? We say no to death penalties,” Miliki said.

Another lawyer, Mr Adejo Isah, stressed the need to take into account the simple fact that death sentence was tantamount to singing a victory song after a civil war, stressing that it was still a dirge to the nation.

Isah, a Legal Adviser to the Petroleum, Environment and Solid Minerals Degradation Awareness Association (PESMDAA), Kogi chapter, urged the Federal Government to put up proper correctional facilities that could help change criminals’ mindsets.

According to him, a criminal who refuses to change can be sentenced to life imprisonment, where he won’t only be left idle but forcefully made to be productive to the government via learning skills, which at perfection, produce useful materials or products.

“That is what obtains in developed countries of the world instead of wasting the criminals for just no gain.

“The law on death sentence should be abolished. We know that death is sacrosanct, but adequate use must be made of every human being before his death.

“The impact of the refusal by the governors to sign death warrants is monumental on the positive side.

“It is a decision that will culminate to making Nigeria belong to one of the echelon of the developed countries of the world as it relates to her justice system.

“It makes the Nigerian justice system more pragmatic and reasonable in the eyes of the western countries, where such ideologies are maturely in place,” Isah said.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cover

NMDPRA’s Fresh Import Licences Will Encourage Dumping of Low-Quality Petrol, Undermine Local Refineries — Energy Transparency Group

Published

on

The decision by the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) to resume the issuance of petrol import licences has drawn sharp criticism from industry advocates, who warn that the move risks undermining domestic refining efforts and exposing the market to substandard fuel products.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, the Energy Transparency and Market Justice Initiative (ETMJI) condemned the regulator’s action, describing it as a policy reversal that could weaken recent gains in local supply while encouraging the inflow of lower-quality petroleum products.

The regulator had earlier maintained that domestic refining capacity was sufficient to meet national demand, suspending the issuance of import licences in February. However, following supply disruptions linked to the Middle East crisis, the agency granted fresh licences to six marketers to import about 180,000 metric tonnes of petrol in a bid to stabilise supply.

While the NMDPRA has framed the move as a temporary intervention, ETMJI said the decision reflects deeper inconsistencies in regulatory direction and raises concerns about quality control in Nigeria’s downstream sector.

Dr Salako Kareem, who signed the statement, said the reintroduction of petrol imports under emergency conditions risks opening the floodgates to products that may not meet required specifications.

“What we are witnessing is a deeply flawed response to a complex problem. Attempting to resolve supply shortages by reintroducing large-scale fuel imports, without watertight quality assurance, is comparable to using poison to cure a disease. It may appear to offer immediate relief, but in reality, it introduces far more dangerous consequences for consumers, the market, and the integrity of the regulatory system,” he said.

Kareem argued that rather than reverting to import dependence, the regulator should have prioritised strengthening domestic supply chains and addressing distribution inefficiencies that often create artificial scarcity.

According to him, the decision sends conflicting signals to investors in local refining, particularly at a time when Nigeria is seeking to reduce its reliance on imported petroleum products.

“This policy direction undermines the confidence of investors who have committed resources to building domestic refining capacity. When the regulator oscillates between import substitution and import expansion without a clear framework, it creates uncertainty that discourages long-term investment and planning in the sector. You cannot, on one hand, advocate self-sufficiency and, on the other, reopen the gates to imports at the slightest disruption,” Kareem said.

The group also raised concerns about the potential economic implications of renewed import activity, noting that increased reliance on imports could exert pressure on foreign exchange and contribute to higher landing costs, which are often passed on to consumers.

ETMJI insisted that external shocks should not justify what it described as a “regulatory backslide” in Nigeria’s fuel supply strategy.

Kareem said the focus should instead be on building resilience within the domestic market by improving logistics, enforcing quality standards and supporting local refiners to operate at optimal capacity.

“Short-term fixes that rely on imports may offer temporary relief, but they do not address the structural weaknesses in Nigeria’s petroleum supply chain. What is required is a disciplined commitment to strengthening local production, enhancing regulatory oversight and ensuring that every litre of fuel consumed in this country meets strict quality benchmarks,” Kareem declared.

He further warned that the reintroduction of imports without stringent monitoring mechanisms could revive long-standing issues of product adulteration and regulatory arbitrage, where market players exploit loopholes for profit.

The advocacy group called on the NMDPRA to provide full transparency on the criteria used in issuing the new licences, including safeguards put in place to prevent the entry of substandard products into the Nigerian market.

It also urged the federal government to align regulatory actions with its broader energy transition and economic diversification goals, stressing that inconsistent policies could erode public trust and delay progress in the sector.

As Nigeria continues to navigate a complex energy landscape shaped by both domestic constraints and global uncertainties, stakeholders say the balance between ensuring supply and maintaining standards will remain a critical test of regulatory credibility.

Continue Reading

Cover

Zamfara 2027: Northern APC Peace Agenda applauds Matawalle, Dauda Lawal’s reconciliation

Published

on

…commends Matawalle’s large heart, love for President Tinubu’s success above personal interest

The Northern APC Peace Agenda has commended the political reconciliation between Zamfara State governor, Dauda Lawal, and his predecessor, Bello Matawalle, describing their alliance under the All Progressives Congress (APC) as a stabilising development ahead of the 2027 elections.

In a press statement issued on Wednesday in Kaduna and signed by its president, Alhaji Rabiu Ahmad, the group said Matawalle’s decision to forgo any governorship ambition and back Lawal reflects political maturity and a broader commitment to unity within the ruling party.

Matawalle, who currently serves as minister of state for defence, had publicly declared that he would not contest the 2027 governorship election, throwing his weight behind Lawal during a high-profile reception marking the governor’s defection to the APC in Gusau.

Lawal’s move from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the APC effectively realigns Zamfara’s political landscape, bringing both the incumbent and former governors into the same political fold.

The reception, attended by top party figures including Vice-President Kashim Shettima, underscored the significance of the development for the APC’s electoral calculations in the north-west region.

Reacting to the development, Ahmad said the reconciliation signals a rare moment of political responsibility and strategic foresight in a region often defined by intense rivalries.

“The coming together of Governor Dauda Lawal and former Governor Bello Matawalle under one political platform represents a turning point for Zamfara State,” Ahmad said.

“This is not just a political alignment; it is a demonstration of maturity, restraint, and a shared commitment to the stability and progress of the state. At a time when political divisions often undermine governance, this reconciliation sends a powerful message that unity can be prioritised over personal ambition.”

He added that Matawalle’s decision to step aside for Lawal underscores the “large heart” and a clear prioritisation of national interest and party cohesion.

“We commend former governor Matawalle for placing the success of President Bola Tinubu’s administration above personal political considerations,” the statement reads.

“Such a decision reflects loyalty, discipline, and an understanding that the strength of the party and the country must come before individual aspirations. This is the kind of leadership that inspires confidence and strengthens democratic institutions.”

The Northern APC Peace Agenda further noted that the development could reshape political dynamics in Zamfara and the wider north-west region if sustained.

“This alignment has the potential to reset the political trajectory of Zamfara State. With both past and present leadership working together, there is now an opportunity to deepen governance, strengthen grassroots mobilisation, and deliver meaningful development to the people. We believe this unity, if maintained, will not only benefit Zamfara but also contribute to broader stability within the region,” Ahmad said.

The group also described Lawal’s defection as a pragmatic move that aligns the state more closely with the centre, potentially improving policy coordination and access to federal support.

Top APC figures have similarly welcomed the development. The party’s national chairman, Nentawe Yilwatda, said the APC continues to attract leaders committed to governance and national development.

Continue Reading

Cover

Ban on Sachet Alcohol May Trigger Job Losses, Protesters Warn

Published

on

Tension flared in Abuja on Wednesday as a coalition under the aegis of Concerned Citizen for Change staged a protest, calling for the immediate removal of the Director-General of the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC), Prof. Mojisola Christianah Adeyeye, over what they described as “gross incompetence and abuse of office.”

Addressing journalists during a press conference at the protest ground, the group’s Director, Amb. Kingsley Nwanze, criticised the agency’s enforcement of a ban on sachet alcohol and 200ml PET bottle alcoholic products, describing the move as “illegal, arbitrary and economically damaging.”

Nwanze alleged that the enforcement contravenes existing national alcohol policy provisions approved by the Federal Ministry of Health, as well as a presidential directive halting disruptions of affected businesses pending the outcome of stakeholder consultations.

According to him, the action also disregards resolutions of the House of Representatives, which had earlier advised against the ban following a public hearing involving key industry stakeholders.

“The decision is capable of triggering civil unrest and undermining ongoing economic reforms. It will harm legitimate businesses, lead to job losses, and create room for illicit and unregulated products to thrive,” he said.

The group argued that sachet and small-volume alcoholic beverages serve low-income consumers and provide controlled consumption options, contrary to claims that they encourage abuse, particularly among minors.

They further maintained that industry operators had invested heavily in campaigns promoting responsible drinking and restricting underage access, noting that such efforts have yielded measurable results.

Nwanze warned that sustaining the ban could negatively impact government revenue, disrupt the value chain, and encourage smuggling of substandard alternatives into the country.

He said the group had formally petitioned the Senate and expressed confidence that lawmakers would review the matter based on “empirical evidence and stakeholder engagement.”

The protesters, however, urged President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to take decisive action by removing the NAFDAC DG, insisting that her continued stay in office was no longer in the public interest.

As of the time of filing this report, NAFDAC had not issued an official response to the allegations.

The protest highlights growing tensions between regulators and industry players over public health policies and economic considerations in Nigeria’s beverage sector.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 - 2025 DailyMirror Nigeria. Design by AspireWeb.ng, powered by WordPress.