Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has dismissed allegations made by former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, over the conduct of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential primary. Atiku described Lawal’s claims as baseless, urging him to produce evidence rather than rely on accusations.

Allegations Without Proof
Lawal had appeared on national television, accusing Atiku of manipulating the ADC primary. But according to Atiku’s aide, Phrank Shaibu, the former SGF failed to present any verifiable proof.

“Mr. Lawal spent nearly an hour making grave accusations but produced no documents, petitions, result sheets, witness statements, or recordings,” Shaibu said. “He arrived with accusations. He left with accusations. In between, the evidence never arrived.”

Political Disappointment
Atiku’s camp argued that Lawal’s intervention was not that of a whistleblower but of a disappointed political actor. By his own admission, Lawal had openly supported another aspirant before the primary concluded. His criticism, Atiku’s team suggested, stemmed from frustration over the failure of his preferred candidate.

Contradictions in Lawal’s Claims
The statement also pointed to contradictions in Lawal’s narrative. He portrayed Atiku as politically irrelevant yet simultaneously accused him of orchestrating a nationwide conspiracy across 8,809 wards.

“Atiku was supposedly inactive and unpopular, yet he allegedly engineered a nationwide plot. Such arguments are implausible and insulting to party members whose democratic choices he now seeks to invalidate,” Shaibu said.

Targeting Atiku’s Constituencies
Atiku’s team accused Lawal of acting as a “political mercenary,” attempting to weaken the former Vice President’s standing among Christian communities in the Middle Belt and other regions where Atiku retains support.

The statement rejected Lawal’s claim that Atiku had “absolutely nothing,” pointing instead to his record in liberalising Nigeria’s telecommunications sector, advancing economic reforms, supporting private sector growth, and investing in education.

Atiku’s Final Word
Shaibu stressed that Atiku would not engage further on the matter. “This is the final response to Mr. Lawal’s increasingly desperate attempts to remain politically relevant through sensationalism and character assassination,” he said.

He added that Nigerians had heard Lawal’s allegations, seen his performance, and judged for themselves. “The facts remain unchanged. The truth remains intact. And no amount of bitterness can alter either,” Shaibu concluded.

Broader Implications
The clash between Atiku and Lawal reflects the growing tensions within Nigeria’s opposition politics ahead of the 2027 elections. Allegations of manipulation in party primaries are not new, but Atiku’s sharp response underscores his determination to protect his political credibility.

For the ADC, the controversy highlights the challenges of managing internal disputes while presenting itself as a credible alternative in national politics. For Atiku, it is a reminder that his political journey remains under constant scrutiny, with rivals eager to question his influence and relevance.

Looking Ahead
As Nigeria moves closer to the 2027 polls, disputes like this are likely to intensify. Atiku’s dismissal of Lawal’s claims reflects a broader strategy: confront allegations directly, demand evidence, and frame critics as politically motivated.

Whether Lawal produces proof or fades from the conversation, the episode has already added another layer to Nigeria’s complex political narrative. In a political climate where credibility and perception are decisive, Atiku’s insistence on evidence over rhetoric signals how opposition figures intend to defend their standing in the run-up to the next election.

Nigeria’s Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has raised alarm over two recent court judgments that challenge aspects of its timetable for the 2027 general elections. The commission insists that the rulings, if left unaddressed, could disrupt the entire electoral calendar and undermine preparations for the polls.

Court Judgments Spark Concern
The first ruling, delivered on May 20, 2026, in a case brought by the Youth Party, questioned specific timelines in INEC’s schedule. A second ruling, issued on May 26 in a suit filed by the Social Democratic Party (SDP), produced a mixed outcome. While affirming INEC’s authority to issue an electoral timetable, the court nullified certain deadlines relating to candidate nomination and substitution.

INEC Chairman, Prof. Joash Amupitan, told political party leaders at a consultative meeting in Abuja that the commission has filed appeals against both judgments. He stressed that electoral activities are interconnected and cannot be arbitrarily removed without creating chaos.

Why the Timetable Matters
Amupitan explained that the timetable is not a collection of isolated dates but a framework designed to ensure orderly elections. Beyond statutory deadlines, INEC must accommodate several operational processes, including:

• Submission and verification of party membership registers
• Monitoring of primaries nationwide
• Upload of primary results to INEC’s portal
• Candidate nomination procedures
• Printing and quality assurance of ballot papers and result sheets
• Deployment of election materials and training of personnel
• Voter education campaigns
• Procurement of sensitive materials
• Configuration of BVAS machines
• Compliance with legal obligations such as inviting parties to inspect electoral materials

He argued that removing or altering any of these processes without a coherent framework would compromise transparency and efficiency.

Respect for Judicial Process, But Warning of Risks
While acknowledging the authority of the courts, Amupitan said the judgments raise critical questions about the extent of INEC’s constitutional powers. He warned that fragmenting the timetable could destabilize Nigeria’s electoral system.

“The commission considers it imperative that all electoral activities be harmonised within a coherent and workable framework that promotes certainty, transparency, administrative efficiency and equal treatment of all political parties,” he said.

Political Parties Briefed
INEC assured political parties that despite the pending appeals, preparations for the 2027 elections remain on track. Amupitan announced that on June 26, 2026, the commission will issue access codes to parties for its Candidate Nomination Portal. The portal will allow designated officers to upload names and details of candidates. He cautioned that the portal is fully automated and will close once the prescribed period expires.

Broader Implications
The dispute highlights the tension between judicial oversight and electoral management. While courts play a role in ensuring legality, INEC argues that excessive interference in operational timelines could paralyze the system.

Observers note that the controversy comes at a sensitive time, with Nigeria preparing for its first election under a 48-team global football-style calendar of political parties and heightened public scrutiny of democratic institutions. The rulings have already sparked debate about whether Nigeria’s electoral laws provide sufficient clarity on INEC’s powers.

Looking Ahead
INEC’s appeals will determine whether the commission retains full control over its timetable or whether courts will continue to intervene in operational details. For now, the commission insists it will conduct the 2027 polls in strict compliance with the Constitution, the Electoral Act, and lawful judicial pronouncements.

The outcome of these legal battles will shape not only the 2027 elections but also the future of electoral governance in Nigeria. At stake is the delicate balance between judicial authority and the independence of the body charged with safeguarding the nation’s democracy.

Factional Labour Party chairman Julius Abure has issued a sharp warning to Senator Seriake Dickson, leader of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), urging him to tread carefully in his alliance with Peter Obi and his supporters.

Abure’s statement followed Obi’s ratification as NDC’s presidential candidate at the party’s national convention in Abuja. He argued that Dickson must avoid repeating the mistakes that plunged the Labour Party into crisis after the 2023 elections.

Lessons from Labour Party’s Experience
Abure recalled how the Labour Party accommodated Obi’s interests ahead of the 2023 polls, granting tickets to many of his supporters, often at no cost. According to him, the party believed it was investing in a new political movement. Instead, he claimed, those elected later turned against the LP leadership.

He accused Obi and Abia State Governor Alex Otti of abandoning the party structure once in office. “We ensured Obi’s interests were taken care of. Most of the tickets were free, but they later struggled with the leadership of the party,” Abure said.

Crisis and Leadership Battles
The Labour Party’s internal turmoil deepened when the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) acted on a court ruling that declared the tenure of LP executives expired. This led to the emergence of an interim committee led by Nenadi Usman, further weakening the party’s cohesion.

Abure argued that Dickson must learn from this episode by ensuring his loyalists occupy key positions within the NDC. “He needed to bring his own people so that when the chips are down, he will also have people that will speak and defend him,” he advised.

Warning Against Domination
Abure accused Obi’s supporters of attempting to dominate the NDC, just as they did in the Labour Party. “They trooped into NDC with Obi hoping to occupy every space. No leader of any political party seeing what Obi did to the Labour Party will make that mistake again,” he said.

He described Obi’s followers as opportunistic, warning that they could undermine Dickson’s leadership if given unchecked influence.

Political Strategy Ahead of 2027
The warning reflects broader tensions in Nigeria’s opposition politics as parties prepare for the 2027 elections. Abure’s remarks highlight the struggle between established party leaders and new political movements seeking influence.

For Dickson, the challenge lies in balancing Obi’s national appeal with the need to protect NDC’s internal structure. Abure’s advice underscores the risks of ceding too much ground to external forces, especially in a political environment where loyalty often shifts after electoral victories.

Broader Implications
The episode illustrates the fragility of Nigeria’s party system, where alliances are frequently tested by personal ambition and shifting loyalties. Abure’s intervention is not only a warning to Dickson but also a reminder of how quickly political goodwill can unravel.

As the NDC positions itself for 2027, the party must navigate the delicate balance between embracing Obi’s popularity and safeguarding its leadership integrity. Abure’s cautionary tale from the Labour Party crisis serves as a stark reminder that political partnerships, if not carefully managed, can destabilize even the most promising movements.