Connect with us

Opinion

FIFA World Cup: Counting the costs of Super Eagles missed opportunities

Published

on

By Victor Okoye

As the football world prepares for the expanded 48-team 2026 FIFA World Cup, Nigeria is facing the prospect of missing the global showpiece for the eighth time since its inception in 1930, a development that has drawn concern from football stakeholders and sports administrators in the country.

The Super Eagles, who made their World Cup debut at USA 1994, have qualified for the finals six times but failed to reach the tournament on seven previous occasions.

Should Nigeria fail to qualify for the 2026 edition, it would mark the eight miss and a second consecutive absence, further highlighting the rising cost of non-participation in an era of unprecedented financial rewards.

Historically, missing the World Cup was largely a sporting setback. Financial incentives were modest in earlier tournaments.

In USA 1994, FIFA’s total prize money stood at about 62 million dollars, with champions Brazil earning roughly four million dollars.

France 1998 offered about 131 million dollars in total prize money, while winners received around six million dollars.

The figures rose steadily to 300 million dollars at Brazil 2014 and 440 million dollars at Russia 2018 and Qatar 2022.

However, FIFA’s recent review has significantly raised the stakes.

The FIFA Council has approved a record 727 million dollars financial package for the 2026 World Cup, to be co-hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico.

At an estimated exchange rate of 1,500 naira to the dollar, the total sum translates to about 1.09 trillion naira.

Of this amount, 655 million dollars (approximately 982.5 billion naira) will be shared as prize money among the 48 participating teams.

Champions will earn 50 million dollars, runners-up 33 million dollars, third place 29 million dollars and fourth place 27 million dollars.

Teams finishing between fifth and eighth will receive 19 million dollars, ninth to 16th are to receive 15 million dollars, 17th to 32nd will pocket 11 million dollars, while teams ranked 33rd to 48th will earn nine million dollars.

Each qualified nation will also receive 1.5 million dollars as preparation funds.

This guarantees every participating team a minimum of 10.5 million dollars — about 15.75 billion naira — before the tournament begins.

Nigeria’s 2026 qualification campaign ended in disappointment after the Super Eagles finished second behind South Africa in their group and lost the African playoff final to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DR Congo) on penalties.

To date, no public official report has broken down the total operational costs or expenditure to prosecute the 2026 World Cup qualifying campaign (travel, allowances, camps, logistics) but there are concerns and scrutiny over Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) finances.

The scrutiny includes how funds received from FIFA and CAF have been used over the years following the House of Representatives move to probe more than 25 million dollars in FIFA/CAF grants given to the NFF between 2015 and 2025, citing accountability questions.

However, the NFF has petitioned FIFA over alleged player-eligibility breaches by DR Congo, a move that has reopened debate within the football community.

Reacting to the situation, former Super Eagles captain and 1994 AFCON winner, Mutiu Adepoju, described the possibility of another World Cup absence as “a huge setback”.

“Missing one World Cup is painful, but missing two in a row is unacceptable for a country like Nigeria. Beyond pride, the financial loss is enormous and affects football development at all levels,” Adepoju said.

Former NFF Technical Director, Austin Eguavoen, said qualification had become more critical than ever due to the new prize structure.

“In the past, the World Cup was more about exposure. Now, the money involved can change the entire football ecosystem. Missing out means missing an opportunity to invest in grassroots and infrastructure,” Eguavoen said.

Chairman of the Nigeria Premier Football League (NPFL), Gbenga Elegbeleye, said the impact would also be felt in the domestic league.

“When the national team is at the World Cup, it attracts attention to our league and players. Absence reduces visibility, sponsorship interest and confidence in the system,” Elegbeleye said.

Similarly, former Minister of Sports, Solomon Dalung, said Nigeria must treat World Cup qualification as a national project.

“The Super Eagles missing the World Cup repeatedly shows deeper administrative and structural issues. The financial consequences alone should force stakeholders to rethink planning and accountability,” Dalung said.

On the legal challenge before FIFA, NFF Secretary-General, Dr Mohammed Sanusi, confirmed that the matter was under review.

“We have submitted our petition and we are waiting for FIFA’s decision. The rules are clear on nationality and eligibility, and we believe the issues raised deserve careful consideration,” Sanusi said.

If FIFA rules in Nigeria’s favour, the Super Eagles could be reinstated into the intercontinental playoffs, restoring a pathway to qualification and access to guaranteed earnings of at least 15.75 billion naira.

Failure would confirm Nigeria’s eighth World Cup absence, with consequences ranging from lost revenue and reduced global visibility to diminished influence in international football.

With the 2026 World Cup set to deliver the highest financial rewards in FIFA history, stakeholders agree that Nigeria can no longer afford repeated absences from football’s biggest stage. 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headlines

SSCE Fee Hike: Government Must Balance Cost Recovery with Access to Education

Published

on

SSCE Fee Hike: Government Must Balance Cost Recovery with Access to Education By Comrade Yekini Lukmon R. Afolabi  Telephone: 07065313924 Email: yklukmon@gmail.com 
The decision by the Federal Government to approve an 82 per cent increase in the registration fees for the West African Senior School Certificate Examination (WAEC) and the National Examinations Council (NECO), raising the uniform fee from ₦27,500 to ₦50,000 with effect from March 2027, deserves careful reconsideration. While the rationale behind the adjustment may be understandable, its economic and social implications cannot be ignored.
No one disputes the need for periodic reviews of examination fees. The cost of conducting credible public examinations has risen significantly due to inflation, higher logistics expenses, enhanced security requirements, technological innovations, the rising cost of printing materials, and improved remuneration for permanent and ad hoc personnel. These realities are genuine and cannot simply be wished away.
However, public policy should not be formulated in isolation from the prevailing realities confronting citizens. Today, millions of Nigerian households are battling severe economic hardship. Food inflation remains high, transportation costs continue to rise, and the purchasing power of the average family has been severely eroded. For many parents, providing three meals a day has become a struggle. Introducing an 82 per cent increase in examination fees under these circumstances risks placing an unbearable burden on families already stretched beyond their limits.
Nigeria is home to far more struggling parents than affluent ones. A visit to public secondary schools across the country is enough to appreciate the financial realities confronting ordinary families. For many students, the inability to pay examination fees could mean delayed graduation or outright withdrawal from school. Such an outcome would be a setback for a nation that urgently needs an educated and skilled workforce to drive economic growth.
This issue should not be reduced to partisan politics or sensational criticism. Rather, it calls for constructive engagement between government, education stakeholders, parents, and the examination bodies. While the reasons advanced for the increase are legitimate, there is still room for a balanced solution that protects the financial sustainability of WAEC and NECO without denying deserving students access to education.
Education remains one of the strongest instruments for national development. It builds human capital, reduces poverty, promotes social mobility, and strengthens national productivity. Any policy that inadvertently erects financial barriers to secondary education ultimately undermines the country’s long-term development objectives. Equal educational opportunities should not become the exclusive preserve of children from wealthy homes.
Lagos State offers a practical example worthy of consideration. Since 1999, successive administrations have sustained a policy of paying WAEC registration fees for eligible public secondary school students. Initiated during the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu as Governor of Lagos State, the programme has eased the financial burden on parents and enabled thousands of students to complete their secondary education. Many beneficiaries of that intervention are Today making meaningful contributions to Nigeria’s economy and society. I proudly count myself among them.
This is not necessarily an argument that every state government should assume responsibility for paying SSCE examination fees. Rather, it is an appeal to the Federal Ministry of Education and the relevant examination bodies to review the proposed increase with greater sensitivity to the prevailing economic realities. Alternative funding mechanisms, phased adjustments, targeted subsidies for indigent students, or other creative solutions should be explored before imposing such a steep increase.
Education should never become a privilege reserved for those who can afford it. As Nigeria grapples with the challenge of building a prosperous and inclusive society, policies that expand access to education must take precedence over those that inadvertently shut the door on the children of ordinary citizens. Government must therefore strike a careful balance between recovering operational costs and preserving every Nigerian child’s right to quality education.
Let’s leave no child behind.
By Comrade Yekini Lukmon R. Afolabi
Telephone: 07065313924
Continue Reading

Opinion

Patriotic Nigerian Network Driving Diaspora Investment, National Development and Nigeria’s Global Image

Published

on

By Augustine Aminu

As countries around the world increasingly rely on their diaspora communities to stimulate economic growth, attract investments and transfer knowledge, Nigeria is witnessing the emergence of organisations determined to bridge the gap between citizens at home and abroad.

Among them is the Patriotic Nigerian Network (PNN), a United States-based non-governmental organisation positioning itself as a platform for connecting Nigerians across the globe with opportunities to contribute meaningfully to national development.

Rather than limiting diaspora engagement to remittances, the organisation is championing a broader agenda that includes investment promotion, education, infrastructure advocacy, governance reforms and the projection of a more balanced global narrative about Nigeria.

A Vision Beyond Borders
Founded by philanthropist, researcher and professional engineer Emmanuel Akwu Adejo, the Patriotic Nigerian Network is driven by a simple but ambitious vision: eliminating geographical barriers that separate Nigerians while fostering a united commitment to nation-building.

According to Adejo, Nigeria’s future depends not only on government interventions but also on the collective expertise, financial resources and patriotic commitment of millions of Nigerians living abroad.

He explained that the organisation was established to move beyond conversations by creating practical initiatives capable of delivering measurable developmental impact while documenting authentic stories that reflect Nigeria’s resilience and progress.

Redefining Diaspora Engagement
Nigeria remains one of Africa’s largest recipients of diaspora remittances, with billions of dollars flowing into the country annually. However, stakeholders argue that the true value of the diaspora extends far beyond financial transfers.

The Patriotic Nigerian Network seeks to harness the intellectual, professional and entrepreneurial capacity of Nigerians overseas by creating structured platforms for engagement in national development.

Its programmes are designed to encourage collaboration between professionals abroad and institutions in Nigeria while supporting initiatives capable of generating sustainable economic growth.

According to the organisation, diaspora communities possess significant expertise in engineering, medicine, technology, education, finance and entrepreneurship that can accelerate national transformation when effectively coordinated.

Promoting Trusted Investment Opportunities
One of the Network’s flagship initiatives focuses on addressing one of the biggest concerns among Nigerians abroad—safe and transparent investment opportunities.

The organisation is developing trusted channels that enable diaspora Nigerians to invest in real estate and other development projects with greater confidence through transparency, accountability and proper verification mechanisms.

By reducing investment risks and strengthening investor confidence, the initiative aims to encourage greater diaspora participation in Nigeria’s housing and infrastructure sectors.

The organisation believes that creating a credible investment ecosystem will not only benefit Nigerians abroad but also stimulate local economic activities, create jobs and contribute to national development.

Investing in Education and Human Capital
Beyond investment promotion, the Patriotic Nigerian Network considers education a critical pillar of sustainable development.
Through strategic partnerships, mentorship programmes and advocacy initiatives, the organisation seeks to improve access to quality education while equipping young Nigerians with skills required to compete in today’s rapidly evolving global economy.

The Network argues that investing in education remains one of the most effective strategies for reducing poverty, promoting innovation and preparing future generations for leadership.

Infrastructure as a Catalyst for Growth
The organisation also advocates improved infrastructure and stronger economic integration across Nigeria.

It believes better connectivity among cities, markets and businesses will enhance commerce, improve productivity and unlock new opportunities for investment and employment.

According to the Network, sustainable infrastructure development remains essential to achieving inclusive economic growth and improving the quality of life for millions of Nigerians.

Changing the Global Narrative
Beyond development initiatives, the Patriotic Nigerian Network is working to reshape international perceptions of Nigeria.

For decades, global conversations about Nigeria have often focused on insecurity, corruption and economic challenges. While acknowledging these realities, the organisation argues that they should not overshadow the country’s achievements in innovation, healthcare, entrepreneurship, education, technology, culture and community service.

By documenting credible success stories and promoting evidence-based narratives, the Network hopes to project a more balanced image of Nigeria internationally.

Its leadership maintains that accurate storytelling backed by research can strengthen investor confidence, attract international partnerships and inspire greater national pride among Nigerians worldwide.

Advocacy for Good Governance
The Network also places governance reforms at the centre of its advocacy efforts.
Through constructive engagement with stakeholders, it promotes transparency, accountability and responsive public institutions, arguing that sustainable development depends on effective governance and citizen participation.

According to the organisation, stronger institutions are essential for attracting investments, protecting public resources and ensuring long-term national progress.

The Growing Role of the Nigerian Diaspora
Observers say organisations like the Patriotic Nigerian Network reflect a growing trend of diaspora-led development initiatives that complement government efforts.

With millions of Nigerians residing across North America, Europe, Asia and other parts of Africa, the diaspora represents an enormous reservoir of knowledge, innovation and investment capital capable of accelerating national development.

Experts increasingly believe that structured engagement between the diaspora and local institutions could unlock significant opportunities in infrastructure, healthcare, education, technology, manufacturing and entrepreneurship.

Looking Ahead
As the Patriotic Nigerian Network expands its global footprint, its leadership says the organisation will continue building partnerships that encourage investment, strengthen education, promote accountability and foster national unity.

For Engineer Emmanuel Akwu Adejo, patriotism is not defined by physical location but by a willingness to contribute to Nigeria’s development wherever one resides.

The Network’s long-term ambition is to ensure that Nigerians at home and abroad work together through credible, transparent and sustainable initiatives that translate collective aspirations into measurable national progress.

If sustained, such diaspora-driven efforts could further strengthen Nigeria’s development agenda while reinforcing the idea that nation-building is a shared responsibility that transcends geographical boundaries.

Continue Reading

Opinion

NYSC Reforms and Nigeria’s National Defence Policy

Published

on

By Johnson Akintunde

The reality of today’s Nigeria demands that institutions created as pillars of national survival must be shielded from every form of threats. It isn’t farfetched to conclude that factors like insurgency, transactional kidnappings, separatist agitations, cyber threats, communal conflicts, environmental disasters, and humanitarian emergencies have collectively redefined the meaning of national security. It Is precisely within this strategic framework that I believe the NYSC continues to occupy a unique and indispensable position that must be defended at all cost.

The proposed National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) reform that was approved by Federal Executive Council (FEC) has become the genesis of an existential miscalculation in one of Nigeria’s most enduring nation-building institutions. While it is important to periodically evaluate every institution established by law in order remain relevant to present realities, proposed reforms must never become synonymous with destruction of foundational ideals that have sustained national unity for over five decades.

However, as a legislator that’s privileged serve in House of Representatives Committees on Youth Development and Defence, I have examined these proposed reforms from a unique institutional vantage point. I have viewed it through a broader prism of Nigeria’s national Defence policy, internal security architecture, emergency response, and sustaining national-legacy objectives. It is on this note that I discovered that the proposed NYSC reforms are structurally, fundamentally, and unacceptably not in tandem with the philosophy of Nigeria’s National Defence Policy. Therefore, it must be subjected to further review before any executive or legislative action be taken.

Moreover, I further discovered that the Federal Executive Council (FEC) failed to fully understand that the NYSC was never intended to merely function as an employment programme, but was deliberately created as a national reconciliation mechanism designed to support national integration, heal divisions, encourage intercultural understanding, and build discipline among graduates drawn from every corner of the federation. This misconception became the founding error of an executive hubris. While they thought they have created a solution, they didn’t know they have unknowingly weaponized the administrative machinery of state to strip the NYSC of its foundational ethos.

Consequently, every service year brings together thousands of graduates from different ethnic, religious, cultural, and linguistic backgrounds who would otherwise never have interacted meaningfully. They live together during orientation camps, work together in host communities, build lasting friendships, establish businesses, marry across ethnic lines, and develop a broader understanding of Nigeria’s diversity. To even contemplate transforming a 53-year old bastion of national legacy into a glorified, hyper-fragmented vocational training center is a strategic blunder of seismic proportions.

The centerstroke of the proposed executive policy is the fragmentation of the service year into eleven specialized career streams that ranges from the so-called “Agric Corps” to the “Tech and Digital Corps”, coupled with a heavy focus on business planning, basic accounting, and financial literacy.

Furthermore, this vocational obsession creates a dangerous redundancy. Nigeria possesses numerous agencies mandated to handle youth empowerment and vocational training. Why must we cannibalize a national defense asset to replicate the functions of civilian economic agencies?
The NYSC should complement these initiatives, and not duplicate them. What it requires is strategic strengthening, and not ceremonial abandonment.

Perhaps the greatest weakness of the proposed reforms lies in the apparent disregard for Nigeria’s National Defence Policy. To sacrifice the paramilitary and integrative core of the NYSC on the altar of temporary economic metrics is an act of policy desperation that yields no tangible economic return while severely depleting our national strategic reserve.

Apparently, I have observe how enlightened democratic nations across the world recognize that national Defence extends beyond standing armed forces and military hardware. Countries such as Switzerland, Israel, Finland, and South Korea have consistently invested in different forms of national service and citizen preparedness. Military orientation, emergency response training, disaster management, first aid, civil defence awareness, leadership development, and civic responsibility are now recognised internationally as essential components of national resilience.

Moreover, the orientation camps already expose corps members to elementary drills, discipline, teamwork, endurance, emergency response, and basic security consciousness. These experiences cultivate resilience, patriotism, respect for constituted authority, and collective responsibility. Such values cannot be replicated through classroom lectures on entrepreneurship alone. While other countries are moving in a promising direction, Nigeria should not be moving in the opposite direction.

To fully comprehend the danger of civilianizing the NYSC, it is important I remind everyone of the historical contribution of the corps during the global COVID-19 pandemic era. When the pandemic breached our borders, overwhelmed health systems across the world, it was not corporate consultants or civilian entrepreneurs who stood on the frontlines of the emergency. It was our corps members; most notably the young doctors, nurses, and pharmacists of the NYSC who stepped into the breach to support and complement the shortages of healthcare workers working under extraordinary conditions.

Now, imagine a Nigeria without that coordinated national pool of trained professionals during the pandemic. The consequences could have been far more devastating. Their contributions were not ceremonial. They were operationally significant.

I would like us to turn our precious attention to a specific operational modification, extending the orientation camp from a 3-week to 6-week period and dividing this 6weeks into three 2-week phases. At a first glance, it might be perceived as enriching the program. However, a close observation revealed it to be a logistical camping-nightmare in its entirety. The traditional three-week orientation camp is intensive, immersive, and filled with uninterrupted crucible of regimentation. The days are carefully structured into early morning drills, physical training, lectures on national security, and military parades. It is enthusiastic, leaving no room for sluggishness or laziness.

Unfortunately, this proposed six-week model completely fractures this psychological conditioning. By breaking the camp into distinct, disparate phases where the first two weeks focus on civic responsibility, the next two on financial literacy and business planning, and the final two on stream-specific training.

You cannot build discipline by subjecting an individual to military drills for two weeks, then allowing them to lounge in lecture halls discussing business plans for the next two weeks, before concluding with a superficial introduction to a specialized stream. The intensity is lost; the regimentation is compromised; and the physical conditioning is neutralized. What you are left with is an extended, financially draining exercise that satisfies neither the demands of rigorous military training nor the requirements of deep professional development.

Perhaps the most alarming and hazardous component of the approved reforms is the transition to a civilian operational leadership structure from the accustomed traditional military Director-General. The architects of this policy have attempted to soothe security concerns by claiming that the “safety aspect” will remain anchored by the military while the “operational leadership” shifts to a civilian. This explanation displays a complete ignorance of command structure dynamics.

The NYSC is an organization that deploys hundreds of thousands of young Nigerians across the length and breadth of a vast, complex nation, and operates within a security environment that requires rapid, decisive, and authoritative decision-making. The traditional appointment of a serving Brigadier-General of the Nigerian Army as the Director-General is not an accident of history; it is a structural necessity. A military Director-General brings with him the full weight, intelligence network, logistical capability, and command authority of the Nigerian Armed Forces.

When an NYSC camp faces an imminent security threat, or when corps members are caught in regional volatility, a military DG does not write memos or engage in inter-ministerial consultations. He utilizes direct military radio frequencies, activates local military formations, commands immediate tactical support, and coordinates with state governors from a position of institutional power.

Moreover, this battle-tested command structure with a civilian DG is an invitation to institutional paralysis. A civilian leader, no matter how accomplished in public administration, lacks the tactical training, the immediate access to the defense hierarchy, and the command authority necessary to navigate a national crisis. This will create a dangerous gap and bad signals to criminal elements that the NYSC camps are now porous for attacks.

Another important change to look into is the replacement of the NYSC rugged khaki uniform with the cultural iconic “Adire” attire under the guise of promoting local textile manufacturing. The NYSC khaki uniform has stood for over five decades as a powerful symbol of our unity. This khaki project the youths to Nigerians as soldiers of peace and development, serving a common nation. It is important to note that “Adire” is culturally indigenous the Yoruba people of Southwestern Nigeria. This ethnic ownership presents the decision of an Adire uniform as a glaring short-sighted move that threatens our fragile national peace, and defence policy.

Additionally, to mandate that a national, pan-Nigerian paramilitary organization discard its neutral, unifying uniform in favor of a fabric tied to a specific ethnic group is to invite immediate geopolitical friction that can turn a small misunderstanding into community violence. If “Adire” becomes the compulsory national uniform, what prevents stakeholders from the North from demanding “Fula” or “Babanriga” motifs, or representatives from the South-East or South-South from insisting on “Akwete” or “Isiagu” patterns?

In a country as ethnically sensitive as ours, such a move will inevitably be interpreted through the distorted lens of ethnic triumphalism and cultural hegemony. This proposal evidently lacks both strategic wisdom and cultural sensitivity.

This is an urgent appeal to the president and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, to immediately stop the execution of these reforms. The flaws in this proposed reform are too systemic to be corrected by minor adjustments. This entire policy must be discarded before it causes irreparable damages to our national pride.

However, if any change must occur, the President must set up an expanded stakeholder review committee that will thoroughly evaluate the future of the NYSC. This committee must move beyond the narrow perspectives of economic planners and include a broad coalition of national security experts, seasoned legislators, and community leaders.

I strongly believe that there are better ways to integrate modern digital skills and agricultural trainings without dismantling the military command structure, discarding the symbols that unify the corps, or fracturing the orientation timeline.

As a representative of the people and guardian of our national security, i will not allow this vital institution to be reduced to a fragmented, civilianized training school. Our defence policy demands a prepared citizenry. Our democracy demands patriotic citizens. We all must fight these ill-advised reforms with every constitutional and legislative tool at our disposal, and ensure that the National Youth Service Corps continues to serve as a strategic instrument of national unity, emergency preparedness, civic responsibility, and national defence for generations yet unborn.

Akintunde ex-corp member wrote this piece from Badagry.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 - 2026 DailyMirror Nigeria. Design by AspireWeb.ng, powered by WordPress.