Politics
NASS Urged To Halt Bill Seeking To Discriminate Against National Assembly Staff On CNA post
…Vows to occupy Abuja
The Concerned Yoruba Youth of Nigeria has condemned the proposed bill by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, that mandates only individuals who have served with the chambers to be appointed as the Clerk to the National Assembly (CNA).
Speaking at a press conference in Lagos, the National President of the group, Oluwasegun Thompson, and its National Secretary, Ayofemi Badmus, said the proposed bill is a discrimination to well-meaning Nigerians that qualified to serve as the Clerk.
It said: “We are aware that the Clerk of the National Assembly plays a very important role in the functioning of the National Assembly, overseeing administrative duties, providing procedural advice, and ensuring the implementation of legislative decisions.
“It is a role that requires a deep understanding of parliamentary procedures, administrative acumen, and strong leadership skills. However, from our view, these qualities are not exclusive to individuals who have served within the chambers.
“While the objective of the bill may seem commendable on the surface, a deeper examination of the bill reveals several concerns that cannot be overlooked.
“First and foremost, after careful examination, we discovered that the bill appears to be discriminatory and clearly violates the terms of service that many National Assembly Service Commission (NASC) staff were employed under.
“The Speaker and Members of the House of Representatives should be reminded that hundreds of committed employees of the National Assembly Service Commission have tirelessly devoted their lives to ensuring the legislature runs smoothly.
“Many of these people have devoted decades to honing their skills, becoming experts in the legislative process, and making significant contributions to the National Assembly’s expansion.
“However, It is believed that the National Assembly Service Commission (NASC) was established to oversee the administrative functions of the National Assembly, which further includes the appointment, promotion, and discipline of its staff.
“The commission’s mandate has always been to ensure an efficient, professional, and non-partisan workforce that supports the legislative arm of government.
“By restricting the appointment of the CNA solely to individuals who have served within the chambers, the proposed bill obviously undermines the very essence of the NASC’s role and the career progression of its staff.
“Indeed, the Concerned Yoruba Youth of Nigeria believes that the appointment of the Clerk to the National Assembly (CNA) should be based on competence, experience, and merit.
“The current system no doubt opens the floor for a large pool of qualified candidates, including those who have served in various capacities within the National Assembly’s administrative framework.
“But by narrowing the eligibility criteria with the new proposed Bill, we risk excluding individuals who possess the requisite institutional knowledge and skills, solely because they have not served directly within the chambers.
“Moreover, the bill raises legal and ethical questions. It is essential to consider whether such a restriction aligns with the principles of fairness and equal opportunity enshrined in our nation’s constitution.
“Discriminatory practices, whether intentional or not, have no place In a democratic society that values inclusivity and equal rights.
“Furthermore, we also believe that the proposed bill could have a detrimental effect on the morale of NASC staff. These individuals have dedicated their careers to supporting the legislative process, often without public recognition.
“To now suggest that their contributions are insufficient for consideration for the role of CAN is both disheartening and unjust. Historically, the position of CNA has been occupied by individuals from diverse professional backgrounds within the National Assembly’s workforce.
“This diversity has enriched the leadership of the Assembly, bringing various perspectives and expertise to the role. The proposed bill threatens to erode this tradition by imposing unnecessary limitations on eligibility status.
“However, when we look at other democratic nations, it is evident that flexibility in such appointments allows for the selection of the most qualified individuals, regardless of their specific roles within the legislative framework.
“This approach ensures that meritocracy prevails and that the best candidates are chosen to uphold the integrity of the legislative process. Inclusivity is a cornerstone of any progressive society, and embracing a wide range of experiences and backgrounds, we strengthen our institutions and promote a culture of excellence.
“The proposed bill, however, moves us in the opposite direction by creating an exclusive criterion that limits opportunities for deserving individuals. Perhaps, It’s also critical to take into account the legislation’s unforeseen repercussions.
“For competent people who want to hold leadership roles in the National Assembly’s administrative structure, the restriction on eligibility for the CAN position may unintentionally result in a talent pipeline bottleneck. This limitation further produces a homogenous leadership that is devoid of the variety of perspectives and backgrounds required for creativity and flexibility.
“Therefore, thorough talks with legal experts, all stakeholders, including NASC staff, and civil society organizations are essential before implementing such large reforms. We believe that by taking an inclusive approach, all viewpoints would be taken into account and any law passed would be in the best interests of the country.
“Evidently, natural justice dictates that individuals should have the opportunity to advance in their careers based on merit and performance. But as we observed, the proposed bill contravene this principle by imposing arbitrary restrictions that are unrelated to an individual’s capabilities or contributions.
“To introduce a restriction that favors only those with chamber experience is a blatant act of exclusion, which, if allowed to stand, will breed discontent, discourage merit-based progression, and ultimately weaken the institution. Such a restriction may also lead to perceptions of bias or favoritism, undermining public confidence in the impartiality and fairness of the National Assembly’s administrative appointments.
“Nevertheless, upholding the integrity of our institutions requires that we promote policies that are fair, inclusive, and merit-based. The proposed bill, however, undermines these principles by introducing discriminatory criteria that do not serve the best interests of the National Assembly or the nation.
“Indeed, we believe that if this Bill is passed into law, it will not only create unnecessary division within the National Assembly workforce, but will also set a dangerous precedent that could be replicated across other public service institutions. This is unacceptable and must be resisted by all well-meaning Nigerians.
“Perhaps, we are convinced that the drafter of this Bill did not put the wider implications of their proposal in proper consideration. Legal issues, industrial discontent, and a general decline in trust in the National Assembly system could result from such a move if passed into law.
“We must prevent the emergence of such a preventable calamity. In addition to being discriminatory, this bill directly violates the fundamental values of competence, professional advancement, and institutional justice.
“Nonetheless, we are confident that the House of Representatives, as a critical arm of government, will listen to reasons, and reconsider this ill-advised Bill. The legislature must remain a place where merit and competence take precedence over restrictive and discriminatory policies.
“Therefore, we call on the speaker of the House of Representatives to stepdown this Bill with immediate effect. We further all well-meaning lawmakers to resist every evil attempt to manipulate the career structure of National Assembly Service Commission for sectional or personal gains.”
Politics
BREAKING: Electoral Violence Erupts in Wakama Ward as APC Campaign DG, 12 Party Members Attacked
A wave of electoral violence has reportedly rocked Wakama Ward, where the Director-General of the APC campaign organisation and 12 members of the All Progressives Congress (APC) were allegedly attacked by suspected ethnic militia believed to be loyal to Labour Party candidate, Labaran Maku.
Sources from the area disclosed that the attackers, armed with machetes and axes, inflicted serious injuries on several victims during the assault. Many of those attacked sustained varying degrees of injuries, while two victims are currently receiving treatment in hospital for severe wounds.
One of the victims, Ezekiel Baba, was initially declared missing in the aftermath of the attack, raising fears about his safety. However, following a swift response by personnel of the Nigerian Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC), he was rescued and taken to hospital for medical attention.
Sources further alleged that operatives of the NSCDC apprehended one of the suspected attackers, identified as Peter Assi, a former Councillor of Wakama Ward and a known political associate of Labour Party candidate, Labaran Maku. Security authorities are yet to issue an official statement on the arrest and the circumstances surrounding the incident.
The incident has heightened tensions in the area and raised serious concerns about voter safety and the conduct of the ongoing Nasarawa North Senatorial Bye-Election. Residents and political stakeholders have called on security agencies to swiftly investigate the attack, bring the perpetrators to justice, and ensure adequate security for voters and election officials.
The APC has strongly condemned the incident, describing it as a dangerous act of political violence capable of undermining the credibility of the electoral process.
Security authorities are yet to issue a comprehensive official statement on the incident, while efforts to obtain a response from the Labour Party candidate and other relevant stakeholders were ongoing at the time of filing this report.
Cover
Judicial Battle Reboots Kwara ADC’s 2027 Election Machinery
The Kwara State chapter of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) has converted a recent legal threat into a political launchpad. Following an appellate court victory that halted an attempt to deregister the party, the Kwara ADC has declared its full readiness to contest the 2027 general elections.
A Federal High Court judgment by Justice Peter Lifu originally ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to deregister the ADC along with four other opposition parties.
The decision was met with an outcry by opposition coalition who alleged the judicial action was another manipulative scheme to cripple opposition politics in the nation and give an unearned leap to ruling parties for the 2027 election cycle.
The “threat however, disappeared into thin air as the Court of Appeal in Abuja swung into action and delivered a strong rebuff on the lower court. A stay of execution of the deregistration order was issued by the Court of Appeal.
Experts and political leaders in opposition said the lower court’s ruling had contravened judicial hierarchy as courts above had already issued a stay of proceedings. It has returned to status quo, following the successful legal defence as the Kwara State chapter of the ADC has called an emergency State Executive Committee meeting at its State Secretariat, Ilorin.
Party stakeholders have already turned the page from the legal battle to an intensive grassroots mobilisation as party structures have been instructed to get set for the next election cycle.
“This issue, while appearing like a setback, has only united us more than before,” said the Kwara State Chairman of ADC, Babatunde Muhammed, who assured that “
The Court of Appeal intervention in our case has revived my confidence in the country’s judicial system, and that you cannot simply rubbish an existing political movement because you have access to some judges.
We remain unruffled” he added. Consequently, all ADC Candidates and ward executives in Kwara State have been tasked to commence voter outreach immediately with a unit-by-unit grassroots mobilisation plan that aims to put the current ruling party on the defensive by articulating how the ADC platform and agenda contrast with the performance of the incumbent administration.
The new approach of Kwara ADC will focus primarily on local security issues, fiscal and economic management and ensuring a free and fair electoral system in 2027 election.
Cover
Voter Apathy and Money Politics Threaten Democratic Future
Nigeria’s democracy faces mounting pressure from two persistent threats: voter apathy and the dominance of money in politics. The Institute for Peace and Conflict Resolution (IPCR), alongside Search for Common Ground, has warned that these forces are eroding citizen participation and weakening democratic institutions.
At a joint press conference in Abuja marking Democracy Day 2026, IPCR Director-General Dr. Joseph Ochogwu stressed that Nigeria’s democratic challenges stem not from the system itself but from declining civic engagement. He argued that democracy thrives only when citizens actively participate, hold leaders accountable, and reject manipulation.
Ochogwu identified several drivers of voter apathy: declining trust in institutions, fear of electoral violence, unmet governance expectations, and the widespread belief that individual votes do not matter. These factors, he said, discourage citizens from voting and weaken the legitimacy of elected governments.
When citizens withdraw from democratic processes, space opens for manipulation, misinformation, and electoral malpractice. Ochogwu warned that disengagement undermines accountability and allows narrow interests to capture democratic institutions. He urged Nigerians, especially young people, to see elections not as routine events but as the primary means of exercising sovereignty.
Beyond apathy, the monetisation of politics poses another grave danger. Ochogwu described money politics as a systemic driver of disenfranchisement. Wealthy elites dominate political participation, while ordinary citizens are excluded from meaningful influence. Within parties, financial considerations often determine outcomes, sidelining merit and ideas.
Exclusion and Inequality
The dominance of money in politics widens inequality, restricting opportunities for citizens without financial power to contest or participate. Ochogwu warned that this distortion undermines democratic fairness and entrenches a system where governance is shaped by wealth rather than public interest.
Ochogwu also highlighted terrorism, banditry, and violent extremism as enemies of democracy. These threats erode public confidence in institutions and hinder development. He stressed that insecurity compounds the challenges of apathy and money politics, creating a fragile democratic environment.
Gift Omoniwa, Director of Programmes at Search for Common Ground, raised concern about Nigerian youth being vulnerable to recruitment by extremist groups. She warned that without meaningful engagement, young people could be drawn into violence, further destabilising democracy.
Omoniwa outlined efforts to counter these risks, including a reality television programme showcasing youth resilience and alternatives to extremism. She reaffirmed her organisation’s commitment to working with government, civil society, and communities to promote peace and democratic governance.
Ochogwu closed his remarks by reminding Nigerians that democracy requires collective responsibility. He echoed President Bola Tinubu’s Democracy Day appeal, stressing that democracy is bigger than any individual and depends on shared commitment and continuous engagement.
Since 1999, Nigeria has maintained uninterrupted civilian rule, the longest stretch in its post-independence history. Yet this achievement remains shadowed by low voter turnout, political violence, and the outsized influence of money. The warnings from IPCR and Search for Common Ground underscore the urgent need for reforms that strengthen civic participation and reduce the grip of money on politics.
Nigeria’s democratic survival depends on citizens rejecting apathy and resisting money politics. Without active participation and fair competition, democracy risks becoming hollow, vulnerable to manipulation and exclusion. The call from IPCR and Search for Common Ground is clear: Nigerians must reclaim their democracy by engaging, voting, and demanding accountability.
-
Cover10 months agoNRC to reposition train services nationwide.. Kayode Opeifa
-
Fashion9 years agoThese ’90s fashion trends are making a comeback in 2017
-
Entertainment9 years agoThe final 6 ‘Game of Thrones’ episodes might feel like a full season
-
Politics3 months agoNNPP Diaspora Stakeholder and Key Kwankwaso Ally, Dr. Usman Tijjani Shehu, Rejoins APC
-
Opinion2 years agoBureaucratic Soldier, Kana Ibrahim heads Ministry of Aviation and Aerospace After Transformative Tenure at Defence
-
Opinion1 year agoHon. Daniel Amos Shatters Records, Surpasses Predecessor’s Achievements in Just Two Years
-
Opinion7 months agoBarrister Somayina Chigbue, Esq: A rising legal leader shaping institutioal excellence in Nigeria
-
News11 months agoNigerian Nafisa defeats 69 Countries at UK Global Final English Competition
