Cover
Stop castigating court over N100m awarded to 2 DSS staff, CDHR cautions SERAP
The Committee for the Defence of Human Rights (CDHR) has rapped the Socio-economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) for berating the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) over Tuesday’s judgement awarding N100 million to two operatives of the Department of State Services (DSS) defamed by the NGO.
Aside the N100 million awarded for general damages, Justice Halilu Yusuf ordered SERAP to pay Operatives Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele N1 million as cost of litigation, tender apology in two national newspapers and two television stations, as well as on its website and X handle.
SERAP and persons associated with the NGO have been condemning the judgement, describing it as a “travesty” and an attempt by government to muzzle free speech.
While one senior lawyer and trustee of SERAP, Ebun-Olu Adegborowa alleged that the judgment did not reflect the legal arguments canvassed in the case, the group’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, described the judgement as strange.
“I’ve been in court several times where I’ve seen even undefended defamation cases that get thrown out because it’s straightforward.
You have to prove that the statement was made, you have to prove that it referred to the claimant, you have to prove that it was false, you have to prove that it was published to a third party, and you have to prove damages — how you lowered their reputation in the eyes of right-thinking members of society,” said Oluwadare Thursday on News Central TV.
However, CDHR frowned at SERAP’s outbursts, saying it was at variance with the ideals of the NGO which claims to be championing socio-economic rights and accountability.
Said CDHR, “As a foremost human rights organization committed to the rule of law, constitutionalism, and democratic accountability, CDHR believes that every individual and institution — including civil society organisations — must respect the decisions of competent courts, regardless of personal opinions or institutional interests.
“While citizens and advocacy groups retain the constitutional right to freedom of expression and public criticism, such rights must be exercised responsibly and within the bounds of the law.
The court, after reviewing the evidence before it, found that the publication made against the DSS operatives was defamatory and injurious to their professional reputation,” noted the group, in a statement signed by Comrade Debo Adeniran and Comrade Deacon Jeremiah Onyibe, President and Secretary Board of Trustees and National Publicity Secretary respectively.
“The rule of law remains the foundation of every democratic society. Human rights advocacy must coexist with accountability, fairness, and respect for due process.
“CDHR reiterates that no organisation, regardless of its status in civil society, is above the law, just as no security agency should be shielded from lawful scrutiny. Justice and responsibility must apply equally to all,” stressed the group.
CDHR advised SERAP to “respect the judgment of the court; comply with all lawful directives contained in the judgement pending any appeal, and to refrain from further public statements capable of worsening tensions or undermining judicial authority.”
The group also advised SERAP to “allow the legal process run its full course through the appellate system if it remains dissatisfied with the judgment, and to avoid inflammatory narratives capable of deepening institutional distrust or portraying the judiciary as partisan without credible basis.”
On its part, the Centre Against Injustice and Domestic Violence (CAIDOV) upbraided
SERAP for deriding the judgement of the court. The group’s position was contained in a statement signed by its Executive director, Comrade Gbenga Soloki.
Said CAIDOV, “SERAP first made the claim that DSS officers invaded their Abuja office on September 9, 2024. Nearly two years after, and realising that they misrepresented the facts, it is worrying that the tweet is still pinned on their X handle.
“We in the human rights community should lead by example. We should not be seen as the very persons breaching human rights in the name of free speech. Human rights is universal. It is for everybody. We should not trample on the rights of others simply because they chose to be security agents.
“Very big corporations around the world have at one time or the other been caught lying or cheating. Just last year, Deloitte, PwC, & EY Netherlands was fined $8.5 million for cheating. In 2024, KPMG Netherlands was fined
$25 million for widespread cheating on training exams.’What, therefore, is is the big deal in a Nigerian court imposing a N100 million (less than $72,000) fine on SERAP for defamation which is euphemism for lying?”
Continued the group, “Seeing senior lawyers like Ebun-Olu Adegborowa, who ordinarily should be encouraging their clients to appeal judgements, spend time castigating judgements already delivered, leaves a sour taste in the mouth.
“SERAP had nearly two years the matter lasted in court to assemble the best lawyers in their arsenal. They failed to. All their legal luminaries waited until they lost the case, then turned to the media to wage propaganda against two operatives of the DSS.
“It is sad that the same SERAP that has a history of relying on our law courts to hold government agencies and public office holders accountable, is now disparaging the same institution simply because they didn’t win this time around.
“If people like Ebun-Olu Adegborowa feel that they know more than our very reverred learned judges, it is not too late for him to transmute from a lawyer to a judge,” the group declared.
Cover
Jack-Rich to New APC Decampees: You’re Welcome, But You Can’t Take Everything
Oil mogul and philanthropist Tein T.S. Jack-Rich on Wednesday fired a warning shot at “new entrants” in the All Progressives Congress, vowing that legacy members who built the party will not be pushed aside, moments after submitting his expression of interest and nomination forms to contest the Rivers West Senatorial District seat on the APC platform.
“Today, I came to submit my form for expression of interest and nomination for the seat of Senate of Rivers West, Rivers State, because I am from Rivers State,” Jack-Rich told journalists in Abuja after filing his papers at the APC national secretariat. He said the move was driven by a long-standing commitment to the party and a desire to deliver “experienced and effective representation” for his people.
But the businessman quickly pivoted from his ambition to party politics, drawing a line in the sand over internal displacement. “What is important to the party is to continue to recognise and honour legacy members who have been there from inception, while also accommodating new entrants for growth,” he said. Balancing inclusiveness with loyalty, he added: “It is important to hold dearly your biological child while adopting new children. That balance must be maintained.”
Jack-Rich, who claims over 28 years in the oil industry, positioned himself as a foundation pillar of the APC. “I have been one of the key supporters of this party at both the state and national levels. I have supported governors, assembly members, representatives, senators and even presidents, and I will continue to do so,” he said.
His tone hardened as he recalled the party’s early struggles. “We were there when they called us names. I was there when they didn’t believe in us and when they tried to stop us,” he said. “Today that we have a president, some people are coming in hard and trying to push us out. We will not accept it.”
While welcoming the “influx of new members” as good for democratic expansion, Jack-Rich cautioned that it “should not come at the expense of those who built the party.” He added, “These new entrants are welcome, as it is good for the expansion of democracy, but they cannot take everything away.”
Despite the internal warnings, the Rivers-born aspirant struck an optimistic note on his chances. “I am happy to say I have submitted my form, and I am going to work hard for the primaries. I believe strongly that I will win the Senate seat. Rivers West will be great again,” he declared.
Jack-Rich also pitched his professional track record as legislative capital. “I have over 28 years of experience in the oil industry,” he noted, saying the expertise would be an “added advantage in legislative duties,” particularly on energy, Niger Delta development, and economic policy.
With his form now submitted, Jack-Rich enters a Rivers West race expected to test the APC’s ability to manage its old guard and new wave under one tent — a balance he insists the party cannot afford to get wrong.
Cover
NEYGA slams SERAP for calling court judgement awarding N100m to two defamed DSS operatives ‘a travesty’
The Northern Ethnic Youth Group Assembly (NEYGA) has rapped the The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) for describing as “a travesty” Tuesday’s judgement of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), awarding N100 million in damages against the NGO.
In addition to the N100 million, the court ordered SERAP to publish apologies in two national newspapers and two television stations to the two Department of State Services (DSS) operatives defamed by the NGO.
Shortly after the court rose, SERAP issued a statement dismissing the judgement as a “travesty,” a “blow to civic space in Nigeria,” and “a troubling pattern under the government of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu of using defamation laws to punish legitimate criticism and suppress accountability.”
However, in a statement issued Wednesday in Kaduna, NEGYA described SERAP’s comments as “deeply troubling and irresponsible for a group that purports to promote socio-economic rights and accountability.”
Noted NEGYA, “We are saddened by the deeply troubling and irresponsible outburst by SERAP in the wake of the Tuesday judgement by an FCT high court. Shocking is SERAP’s attempt to link the judgement to an attempt to gag free speech.” The statement signed by NEYGA’s spokesperson, Alhaji Ibrahim Dan-Musa.
Noted the group, “On the surface, SERAP pretends to live by its name- promoting socio-economic rights and accountability. Deep down, however, it would seem that SERAP would rather every other person or group, but itself, be held accountable.
“Isn’t it hypocritical for SERAP to be hailing the exparte order granted by a Federal High Court against the Nigerian Broadcasting Commission (NBC), but thumps the judgement of a court of coordinate jurisdiction as ‘a travesty?'”
Continued NEYGA, “To be sure, the socio-economic rights SERAP purports to promote is not the exclusive preserve of the NGO, or of any person or group of persons.
That point was clearly made by Justice Halilu Yusuf. In his judgement, the learned judge stated that SERAP cannot seek to hold others accountable and yet not want to subject itself to the scrutiny of accountability when it defames innocent citizens.
“It is disappointing that SERAP that has over 30 pending court cases against agencies of the Nigerian government, would describe the judgement of a high court as a “travesty ” simply because it didn’t go its way.
“NEYGA advises SERAP to tow the path of civility which, surprisingly, the two DSS officers towed. In times past, the DSS and their officers would have resorted to self-help. This is the first time in Nigerian history that security personnel who felt hurt by the actions of others approached a court for remedy.
“That SERAP, which still has the window of appeal in this matter up to the Supreme Court, can afford to call the judgement of a high court a ‘travesty,’ goes to show how toxic and intolerant the NGO is.
“Finally, we commend the DSS Director General, Oluwatosin Adeola Ajayi, for offering both operatives the golden opportunity to take the matter to court. The DSS leadership has proven that individuals have a right to protect themselves.
This noble action by the DSS leadership, not only has helped enrich our jurisprudence, but would help other security agencies realize that they, like other Nigerians, have rights which nobody can breach without consequences,” NEYGA declared.
Cover
Official waste of government resources and national wealth, group slams NNPCL GMD over MOU with Chinese firm to revive dead refineries
…demands accountability into past investment of $3.5b for PHC, Warri and Kaduna refineries
A coalition of oil sector reform advocates has criticised the latest agreement by the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC) Limited with Chinese firms to revive Nigeria’s refineries, describing the move as a wasteful recycling of failed strategies and a troubling signal of weak accountability in the management of public resources.
The group, the Centre for Energy Sector Transparency (CEST), made its position known in a statement issued on Wednesday and signed by its executive director, Dr Oghenetega Edafe, following the announcement of a new memorandum of understanding between NNPC Ltd and two Chinese companies for a proposed technical equity partnership.
The agreement is aimed at completing rehabilitation work and restarting operations at the Port Harcourt and Warri refineries, assets that have remained largely dormant despite multiple rounds of government-funded turnaround maintenance.
Edafe said the development raises serious questions about fiscal discipline, policy coherence, and the absence of accountability for previous investments running into billions of dollars.
“What Nigerians are witnessing is a troubling pattern of policy repetition without reflection. The same refineries that have gulped enormous public funds over the years are once again at the centre of a fresh round of agreements, yet there has been no transparent accounting of what has already been spent or why those investments failed to deliver results,” he said.
The group specifically referenced earlier government approvals of over $1 billion for refinery rehabilitation projects, warning that proceeding with new partnerships without a public audit of past expenditures undermines trust in the system.
“It is unacceptable that after committing over one billion dollars to refinery rehabilitation, the nation is being asked to embrace yet another agreement without a clear and verifiable audit of previous interventions. This is not just about policy failure; it is about the potential erosion of public trust in how national wealth is managed,” Edafe said.
He argued that while the introduction of a technical equity model may appear innovative, it does not absolve the government and NNPC Ltd of responsibility for past inefficiencies and possible mismanagement.
“The idea of bringing in technical partners with equity stakes is not inherently flawed. However, it becomes deeply problematic when it is introduced as a substitute for accountability. Before we speak of new partnerships, Nigerians deserve a full disclosure of how past funds were utilised, who was responsible for project delivery, and why the expected outcomes were not achieved,” he said.
The group also warned that without institutional reforms, the proposed collaboration risks becoming another cycle of investment without sustainable results.
“What is being presented as a strategic shift may, in reality, become another expensive experiment if the underlying governance issues are not addressed. Technical expertise alone cannot fix a system that lacks transparency, oversight, and consequences for failure,” Edafe said.
The Centre called on the National Assembly and relevant anti-corruption agencies to initiate a comprehensive probe of refinery rehabilitation projects over the past decade, including contract awards, disbursements, and project execution timelines.
“This moment demands more than optimism; it demands scrutiny. We call on oversight institutions like the National Assembly, Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and others to undertake a forensic examination of all funds committed to refinery rehabilitation, including the recent billion-dollar interventions. Nigerians must know what has been done with their resources and why the country is still dependent on fuel imports despite repeated promises of self-sufficiency,” he said.
The Centre added that restoring confidence in Nigeria’s oil sector would require not just new agreements, but a demonstrable commitment to transparency, accountability, and institutional integrity.
-
Cover8 months agoNRC to reposition train services nationwide.. Kayode Opeifa
-
Fashion9 years agoThese ’90s fashion trends are making a comeback in 2017
-
Entertainment9 years agoThe final 6 ‘Game of Thrones’ episodes might feel like a full season
-
Opinion1 year agoBureaucratic Soldier, Kana Ibrahim heads Ministry of Aviation and Aerospace After Transformative Tenure at Defence
-
Politics1 month agoNNPP Diaspora Stakeholder and Key Kwankwaso Ally, Dr. Usman Tijjani Shehu, Rejoins APC
-
Opinion1 year agoHon. Daniel Amos Shatters Records, Surpasses Predecessor’s Achievements in Just Two Years
-
Opinion5 months agoBarrister Somayina Chigbue, Esq: A rising legal leader shaping institutioal excellence in Nigeria
-
News9 months agoNigerian Nafisa defeats 69 Countries at UK Global Final English Competition
